We have enough progressives, but some want to be all or nothing. Well we get nothing. 10% of something is always better than 100% of nothing . At some point WINNING has to count more than absolutism.
We have enough progressives, but some want to be all or nothing. Well we get nothing. 10% of something is always better than 100% of nothing . At some point WINNING has to count more than absolutism.
At some point. Catering for your base and what they want is more important then PAC money. 1 billion dollars later. Kamla looses. And DNC RESPONCE is we need more money. No dude, you need to do us cater to YOUR VOTER BASE WANT!!!
Also MSNBC is saying that they should have chosen Shapiro. Dude Waltz was really good. Walt's and kamla as candidates were not the problem. DNC bad pro Genocide policy was the problem.
We have enough progressives, but some want to be all or nothing. Well we get nothing. 10% of something is always better than 100% of nothing . At some point WINNING has to count more than absolutism.
At some point. Catering for your base and what they want is more important then PAC money. 1 billion dollars later. Kamla looses. And DNC RESPONCE is we need more money. No dude, you need to do us cater to YOUR VOTER BASE WANT!!!
Also MSNBC is saying that they should have chosen Shapiro. Dude Waltz was really good. Walt's and kamla as candidates were not the problem. DNC bad pro Genocide policy was the problem.
You are the problem—or rather a problem.