Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nancy's avatar
4hEdited

Earlier this week, the NYT published an op-ed by Senator Van Hollen in which he urged the Democratic Party to end its unconditional support for Israel. In the op-ed, he cited the findings of a number of human rights organizations that concluded Israel has committed genocide. The piece elicited hundreds of comments, not all of them favorable. A lot of posters wrote that neither Gaza, nor the Middle East more generally, were or should be of primary concern to Democratic voters, and focusing on them distracts from issues more important to voters and weakens the party. One poster complained about party members on the left who subject candidates to “purity” tests. This opinion was reflected in other comments without use of the word. On the other hand, a lot of posters generally supported the piece, though not all without caveats, e.g., with expressions of concern for Israel’s safety.

This, and my experience within my own community, which is solidly Democratic, makes me a bit skeptical of the polls. For example, how important is Gaza to voters, even among those who don’t support Israel. At protest marches, I’ve rarely seen antiwar signs and even fewer about Palestine or Gaza. I’ve tentatively concluded that Gaza and the war against Iran are not litmus tests for the majority of Democratic voters, even, or especially, those who are actively participating in protests against Trump. I hope I’m wrong, but those issues still seem to be relatively low on the political radar.

Nina Tatlock's avatar

I appreciate your daily reporting. Thank you all at Zeteo.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?